Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
1.
Tanaffos ; 21(2):113-131, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2261787

ABSTRACT

The 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) causes severe pneumonia called COVID-19 and leads to severe acute respiratory syndrome with a high mortality rate. The SARS-CoV-2 virus in the human body leads to jumpstarting immune reactions and multi-organ inflammation, which has poorer outcomes in the presence of predisposing conditions, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, abnormal adiposity, and even endothelial dysfunction via biomolecular mechanisms. In addition, leucopenia, hypoxemia, and high levels of both cytokines and chemokines in the acute phase of this disease, as well as some abnormalities in chest CT images, were reported in most patients. The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2, the primary cell surface protein, helps the virus anchor and enter the human host cells. Additionally, new mutations have mainly happened for spike protein, which has promoted the infection's transmissibility and severity, which may influence manufactured vaccines' efficacy. The exact mechanisms of the pathogenesis, besides molecular aspects of COVID-19 related to the disease stages, are not well known. The altered molecular functions in the case of immune responses, including T CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells, besides the overactivity in other components and outstanding factors in cytokines like interleukin-2, were involved in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2. Accordingly, it is highly needed to identify the SARS-CoV-2 bio-molecular characteristics to help identify the pathogenesis of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the bio-molecular aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, focusing on novel SARS-CoV-2 variants and their effects on vaccine efficacy.Copyright © 2022 NRITLD, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Iran.

2.
Trials ; 24(1): 185, 2023 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2263588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of vaccination, there remains a need for pre-exposure prophylactic agents against SARS-CoV-2. Several patient groups are more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection by virtue of underlying health conditions, treatments received or suboptimal responses to vaccination. METHODS: PROTECT-V is a platform trial testing pre-exposure prophylactic interventions against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vulnerable patient populations (organ transplant recipients; individuals with oncological/haematological diagnoses, immune deficiency or autoimmune diseases requiring immunosuppression or on dialysis). Multiple agents can be evaluated across multiple vulnerable populations sharing placebo groups, with the option of adding additional treatments at later time points as these become available. The primary endpoint is symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, and each agent will be independently evaluated in real time when the required number of events occurs. Presently, three agents are approved in the platform: intranasal niclosamide, nasal and inhaled ciclesonide and intravenous sotrovimab. DISCUSSION: Despite the introduction of vaccination, there remains a need for pre-exposure prophylactic agents against SARS-CoV-2. Several patient groups are more vulnerable to COVID-19 disease by virtue of underlying health conditions, treatments received or suboptimal responses to vaccination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04870333. EudraCT 2020-004144-28.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol ; 324(5): L722-L736, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2271860

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 viremia is associated with increased acute lung injury (ALI) and mortality in children and adults. The mechanisms by which viral components in the circulation mediate ALI in COVID-19 remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that the SARS-CoV-2 envelope (E) protein induces Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated ALI and lung remodeling in a model of neonatal COVID-19. Neonatal C57BL6 mice given intraperitoneal E protein injections revealed a dose-dependent increase in lung cytokines [interleukin 6 (Il6), tumor necrosis factor (Tnfα), and interleukin 1 beta (Il1ß)] and canonical proinflammatory TLR signaling. Systemic E protein induced endothelial immune activation, immune cell influx, and TGFß signaling and lung matrix remodeling inhibited alveolarization in the developing lung. E protein-mediated ALI and transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) signaling was repressed in Tlr2-/-, but not Tlr4-/- mice. A single dose of intraperitoneal E protein injection induced chronic alveolar remodeling as evidenced by a decrease in radial alveolar counts and increase in mean linear intercepts. Ciclesonide, a synthetic glucocorticoid, inhibited E protein-induced proinflammatory TLR signaling and ALI. In vitro, E protein-mediated inflammation and cell death were TLR2-dependent in human primary neonatal lung endothelial cells and were rescued by ciclesonide. This study provides insight into the pathogenesis of ALI and alveolar remodeling with SARS-CoV-2 viremia in children, whereas revealing the efficacy of steroids.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We reveal that the envelope protein of SARS-CoV-2 mediates acute lung injury (ALI) and alveolar remodeling through Toll-like receptor activation, which is rescued by the glucocorticoid, ciclesonide.


Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury , COVID-19 , Animals , Child , Humans , Mice , Acute Lung Injury/chemically induced , COVID-19/complications , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Glucocorticoids , Lipopolysaccharides/adverse effects , Mice, Inbred C57BL , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptor 2 , Toll-Like Receptor 4/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptors , Transforming Growth Factor beta , Viremia/complications , Viral Envelope/metabolism
4.
PNAS Nexus ; 1(4): pgac197, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2222708

ABSTRACT

Mutations in nonstructural protein 3 (nsp3) and nsp4 of SARS-CoV-2, presumably induced by the asthma drug ciclesonide (which also has anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity), were counted 5,851 cases in the GISAID EpiCoV genome database. Sporadic occurrence of mutants not linked to each other in the phylogenetic tree were identified at least 88 times; of which, 58 had one or more descendants in the same branch. Five of these had spread to more than 100 cases, and one had expanded to 4,748 cases, suggesting the mutations are frequent, selected in individual patients, and transmitted to form clusters of cases. Clinical trials of ciclesonide as a treatment for COVID-19 are the presumed cause of the frequent occurrence of mutations between 2020 June and 2021 November. In addition, because ciclesonide is a common treatment for asthma, it can drive mutations in asthmatics suffering from COVID-19. Ciclesonide-resistant mutations, which have unpredictable effects in humans, are likely to continue to emerge because SARS-CoV-2 remains prevalent globally.

5.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 2022 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2180774
6.
Drug Discov Ther ; 16(5): 225-232, 2022 Nov 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2090752

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in the treatment of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as gauged by pneumonia progression. This multi-center, open-label randomized trial was conducted with patients recruited from 22 hospitals across Japan. Participants were patients admitted with mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 without signs of pneumonia on chest X-rays. Asymptomatic participants were diagnosed after identification through contact tracing. Trial participants were randomized to either the ciclesonide or control arm. Participants in the treatment arm were administered 400 µg of ciclesonide three times a day over seven consecutive days. The primary endpoint was exacerbated pneumonia within seven days. Secondary outcomes were changes in clinical findings, laboratory findings, and changes over time in the amount of the viral genome. In the treatment group, 16 patients (39.0%) were classified as having exacerbated pneumonia compared to 9 (18.8%) in the control group. The risk ratio (RR) was 2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-3.75), indicating a worsening of pneumonia in the ciclesonide group. Significant differences were noted in participants with a fever on admission (RR: 2.62, 90% CI: 1.17-5.85, 95% CI: 1.00-6.82) and individuals 60 years of age or older (RR: 8.80, 90% CI: 1.76-44.06, 95% CI: 1.29-59.99). The current results indicated that ciclesonide exacerbates signs of pneumonia on images in individuals with mild or asymptomatic symptoms of COVID-19 without worsening clinical symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pregnenediones , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Pregnenediones/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Treatment Outcome
7.
Pharmaceutical Journal ; 306(7950), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2064964
8.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 368, 2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2053891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The successful management of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with inhaled ciclesonide has been reported, however few studies have investigated its application among hospitalized patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled all adult patients admitted to our hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection from May to June 2021. Critical patients who received mechanical ventilation within 24 h after admission and those who started ciclesonide more than 14 days after symptom onset were excluded. The in-hospital mortality rate was compared between those who did and did not receive inhaled ciclesonide. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 received inhaled ciclesonide and 85 did not. The use of ciclesonide was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (7.6% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.0003) and a trend of shorter hospital stay (12.0 (10.0-18.0) days vs. 13.0 (10.0-25.3) days, p = 0.0577). In subgroup analysis, the use of inhaled ciclesonide significantly reduced mortality in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection (6.8% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.0001) and in those with a high risk of mortality (16.4% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.0037). The use of inhaled ciclesonide also reduced the likelihood of receiving mechanical ventilation in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection. After multivariate analysis, inhaled ciclesonide remained positively correlated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 0.2724, 95% confidence interval: 0.087-0.8763, p = 0.0291). CONCLUSIONS: The use of inhaled ciclesonide in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection can reduce in-hospital mortality. Further randomized studies in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection are urgently needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pregnenediones , Adult , Hospitalization , Humans , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
9.
Japanese Journal of Chemotherapy ; 69(4):329-333, 2021.
Article in Japanese | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2012479

ABSTRACT

It was expected that the number of patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization would increase worldwide. In the context of the worsening pandemic, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government requested the National Cancer Center Hospital to accept patients with COVID-19. Upon acceptance of the request, six working groups (WGs), i.e., the administrative/medical cooperation group, COVID-19 medical care group, cancer medical care group, medical resource management group, staff work/health management group and infectious disease zoning group, were constituted at our cancer hospital. The objective was to provide appropriate medical care for both cancer patients and patients with COVID-19. A COVID-19-dedicated ward was set up with 23 beds for admission of moderate cases and 2 beds for severe cases. A COVID-19 medical care manual was prepared in collaboration with the COVID-19 treatment team and the infection control team. The Pharmacy Department devised a system by which the ward staff confirmed the drugs that the patients were taking and had brought with them at the time of admission to the COVID-19 ward. The Pharmaceutical Affairs Committee reviewed and approved "off-label use" and "limited patient-only use" of the therapeutic agents favipiravir and ciclesonide for COVID-19. In addition, since the treatment for COVID-19 was prescribed by doctors who were not infectious disease specialists, the pharmacists in the Pharmaceutical Information Section of the Pharmacy Department prepared a master list of drugs with information on each drug that could be prescribed to treat COVID-19, and established a drug-ordering sys¬tem so that there were no errors in the prescription. We accepted patients with COVID-19 for the first time at our hospital in April 2020. We report that we have been able to provide appropriate treatment by applying the in-hospital drug supply system that had been established in the past for cancer treatment. © 2021 Japan Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

10.
Journal of Public Health in Africa ; 13:52, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2006867

ABSTRACT

Introduction/ Background: Early evidence on mortality and ICU intervention rates for SARS-CoV-2 patients, and modelling of COVID in Africa, prompted calls for treatment to prevent progression of mild/moderate COVID. WHO's SOLIDARITY trial aimed to prevent death in hospitalized patients and others looked at prevention, but no trials assessed treatment for mild/moderate cases. Methods: The challenge was to rapidly launch a large and flexible study. A consortium of African research institutions already part of the COVID response and additional technical partners developed a Target- Product-Profile and a clinical protocol to allow percountry adaptation while maintaining key common features. ANTICOV is an adaptive platform trial in 13 African countries, testing two treatment arms (700 max./arm), nitazoxanide/inhaled ciclesonide and ASAQ/ivermectin, in patients with mild/moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptoms up to 7 days before randomisation. ANTICOV has submitted an amendment to test fluoxetine/inhaled budesonide. Ancillary studies are conducted in a subset of countries. Results: This unique, diverse, 26-partner consortium was established rapidly. The protocol was ready for submission by mid-June 2020, and funding was quickly granted, thanks to clear needs and the experience of consortium members. 9 of 13 countries have started recruitment. Despite support from AVAREF, approval processes per country took longer than hoped, and approved drug importation was also a bottleneck. Changes in diagnostic referral impacted recruitment, so active screening was established in some countries. An interim analysis was conducted after 300 patients were randomized with no treatment interruption resulting;the next is planned after 750 patients are randomized. Impact: ANTICOV is driven by a unique research alliance to respond to region/context-specific treatment and pandemic control, unlike much of global research to date. In a context of emerging variants and inequitable vaccine access, effective therapeutics to prevent disease progression globally but prioritized only by the African region until recently. Conclusion: ANTICOV was set up collaboratively, bringing experience and know-how from diverse African and European leaders to find treatment adapted to the needs of low-resource settings. It was rapidly developed and financially supported. Results will be shared quickly. Future pandemic preparedness will require similarly established networks and expedited funding.

11.
Pharmaceutics ; 14(7)2022 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1957414

ABSTRACT

Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid used to treat asthma and has been repurposed as a treatment for mildly ill COVID-19 patients, but its precise mechanism of action is unclear. Herein, we report that ciclesonide blocks the coronavirus-induced production of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 by increasing IκBα protein levels and significantly decreasing p65 nuclear translocation. Furthermore, we found that the combination of ciclesonide and dbq33b, a potent tylophorine-based coronavirus inhibitor that affects coronavirus-induced NF-κB activation a little, additively and synergistically decreased coronavirus-induced IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 cytokine levels, and synergistically inhibited the replication of both HCoV-OC43 and SARS-CoV-2. Collectively, the combination of ciclesonide and dbq33b merits consideration as a treatment for COVID-19 patients who may otherwise be overwhelmed by high viral loads and an NF-κB-mediated cytokine storm.

12.
EClinicalMedicine ; 49: 101484, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1944823

ABSTRACT

Background: The effectiveness of combination therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia remains unclear. We evaluated favipiravir, camostat, and ciclesonide combination therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: In this open-label phase 3 study, hospitalized adults who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and had COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled prior to official vaccination drive in Japan. Participants were randomly assigned to favipiravir monotherapy or favipiravir + camostat + ciclesonide combination therapy. The primary outcome was the length of hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection after study treatment. The hospitalization period was calculated from the time of admission to the time of patient discharge using the clinical management guide of COVID-19 for front-line healthcare workers developed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (Version 3). Cases were registered between November 11, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registration: jRCTs031200196. Findings: Of 121 enrolled patients, 56 received monotherapy and 61 received combination therapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The median time of hospitalization was 10 days for the combination and 11 days for the monotherapy group. The median time to discharge was statistically significantly lower in the combination therapy vs monotherapy group (HR, 1·67 (95% CI 1·03-2·7; P = 0·035). The hospital discharge rate was statistically significantly higher in the combination therapy vs monotherapy group in patients with less severe COVID-19 infections and those who were ≤60 years. There were no significant differences in clinical findings between the groups at 4, 8, 11, 15, and 29 days. Adverse events were comparable between the groups. There were two deaths, with one in each group. Interpretation: Combination oral favipiravir, camostat and, ciclesonide therapy could decrease the length of hospitalization stays without safety concerns in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. However, lack of hard clinical primary outcome is one of the major limitations of the study. Funding: This research was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number 20fk0108261h0001.

13.
J Mol Model ; 28(8): 212, 2022 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1919808

ABSTRACT

The recent outbreak "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)" is caused by fast-spreading and highly contagious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2). This virus enters into the human respiratory system by binding of the viral surface spike glycoprotein (S-protein) to an angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE2) receptor that is found in the nasal passage and oral cavity of a human. Both spike protein and the ACE2 receptor have been identified as promising therapeutic targets to develop anti-SARS-CoV2 drugs. No therapeutic drugs have been developed as of today except for some vaccines. Therefore, potent therapeutic agents are urgently needed to combat the COVID-19 infections. This goal would be achieved only by applying drug repurposing and computational approaches. Thus, based on drug repurposing approach, we have investigated 16 bioactive components (1-16) from different nasal spray solutions to check their efficacies against human ACE2 and SARS-CoV2 spike proteins by performing molecular docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation studies. In this study, three bioactive components namely ciclesonide (8), levocabastine (13), and triamcinolone acetonide (16) have been found as promising inhibitory agents against SARS-CoV2 spike and human ACE2 receptor proteins with excellent binding affinities, comparing to reference drugs such as nafamostat, arbidol, losartan, and benazepril. Furthermore, MD simulations were performed (triplicate) for 100 ns to confirm the stability of 8, 13, and 16 with said protein targets and to compute MM-PBSA-based binding-free energy calculations. Thus, bioactive components 8, 13, and 16 open the door for researchers and scientist globally to investigate them against SARS-CoV2 through in vitro and in vivo analysis.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Drug Repositioning , Humans , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Molecular Docking Simulation , Nasal Sprays , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2
14.
International Journal of Gerontology ; 16(2):144-146, 2022.
Article in English | English Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1884654

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a threat to global public health. The disease is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and characterized by high transmission, high mortality, lack of effective treatment, and prolonged hospitalization. Currently, there is no clear management strategy for COVID-19 infection. Some clinical evidence suggests that the use of inhaled ciclesonide and enoxaparin subcutaneous injection maybe helpful for disease treatment. In this article, we report the successful treatment of a 65-year-old male with COVID-19 pneumonia with Inhaled corticosteroid and enoxaparin subcutaneously, which also shortened the course of the disease without significant complications. Copyright (C) 2022, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.

15.
Letters in Drug Design and Discovery ; 19(5):428-439, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1862451

ABSTRACT

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic and emergency. Currently, there is no therapeutic agent that has been proven effective against the virus. Objective: We investigated and screened for 401 antiviral compounds that could inhibit one or more of the three protein targets in SARS-CoV-2 chymotrypsin-like (3CL) protease, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and spike glycoprotein) using the in-silico approach. Methods: Lipinski’s rule of five was used as an initial screening for relevant compounds. Ligand preparation was conducted using JChem software and Schrödinger’s LigPrep module, while protein elucidation was conducted using AutoDockTools-1.5.6. Molecular docking was analyzed using Au-toDockVina. Results: Five antiviral compounds were obtained from each SARS-CoV-2 protein with ideal and potential binding energy as a candidate for target protein inhibition on SARS-CoV-2, TAK-981;lopinavir, mefloquine, and sitagliptin were potent inhibitors of 3CL protease;imatinib, relacatib, AZD7986, imatinib, and TAK-981 proteins showed potential as inhibitors of RdRp tetrandrine, and, selinexor, imatinib, lopinavir, and ciclesonide, showed potential as inhibitors of glycoprotein AZD7986. These compounds have better binding energy than the three comparator drugs, remdesivir, chloroquine, and hydroxychloroquine. Conclusion: We obtained several antiviral compounds with reliable binding energies to the SARS-CoV-2 proteins and potentially better efficacy than the three comparator drugs. Furthermore, this research will help accelerate the development of Covid-19 drugs.

16.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery ; 35(2):A2, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1815946

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that infects epithelial cells in the naso- and oropharynx before infecting epithelial cells of the lower airways and alveoli and in severe COVID-19 spreading systemically and inducing a systemic inflammatory response. SARS-CoV-2 is spread mainly by virus particles in droplets and aerosols. This suggests that inhaled therapies may be useful in the treatment of early COVID-19 disease before severe respiratory systemic features develop and potentially in reducing transmission of the virus in the community. To be effective any inhaled therapy must be rapidly acting to prevent viral replication in respiratory epithelial cells to prevent the disease spreading down the respiratory tract and into the systemic circulation. It also needs to be safe and available for early prescription in order to prevent severe disease and hospitalisation. The development of inhaled therapies for COVID-19 may involved repurposing of existing inhaled therapies or developing inhaled formulations of new drugs with antiviral effects. Patients with asthma and COPD were reported to be less likely to be hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2 infection despite the concern that this coronavirus would have severe consequences for these patients as coronaviruses are known to trigger severe exacerbations. One possibility was that this may be due to the widespread treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), which are known to suppress ACE2 and TMPRSS2 on epithelial cells that are key entry receptors for the virus and also reduce virus replication in vitro. A community based open label parallel group phase 2 study of the ICS budesonide (800 lg bid until recovery) in people with early symptoms (within 7 days of onset) of COVID-19 and confirmed by PCR testing (STOIC) showed that only 1/69 people in the ICS group developed severe disease compared with 10/70 in the usual care group.1 Clinical recovery was also shorter in the ICS group. This finding was confirmed in an open label study of inhaled budesonide in individuals over the age of 65 years at risk from severe COVID-19 (PRINCIPLE), which showed a reduction in time to recovery and a trend towards reduced hospitalisation and death.2 Several other trials, including double-blind studies, of ICS in early COVID-19 are currently underway with different corticosteroids, including ciclesonide, which appears to be the most effective against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.3 However, a recent double-blind study of nasal and inhaled ciclesonide failed to show any benefit in early COVID-19, although the population was mainly young adults who have a low risk of disease progression.4 The mechanism of action of ICS in COVID- 19 has not yet been established, but may involve reduced viral entry due to suppression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in airway epithelial cells, reduced viral proliferation or reduced inflammatory mediators secreted by airway epithelial cells that may promote viral spreading. Interferon b1 is currently approve for treating multiple sclerosis. Nebulised IFN-b1a (SNG001) gave a greater degree of clinical improvement in hospitalised COVID-19 patients and a reduction on symptoms (mainly dyspnoea) compared to with placebo and was well tolerated.5 However, studies in early disease are underway but have not yet been reported, although there are logistical problems in the need for a nebuliser to deliver the drug. Inhaled PUL-42 is a combination of a TLR2/6 and a TLR9 inhibitors which is effective in a single inhaled dose against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infection in mice and reduces the lung viral load.6 This drug is now in clinical trials for COVID-19. Other inhaled drugs, including antivirals such as remdesivir and niclosamide, are also in development.

17.
J Pharmacol Sci ; 149(3): 81-84, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1796436

ABSTRACT

Ciclesonide (Cic) is approved as an inhalant for asthma and was clinically tested as a candidate therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Its active metabolite Cic2 was recently reported to suppress genomic RNA replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In this study, we designed and synthesized a set of ciclesonide-acetal (Cic-acetal) derivatives. Among designated compounds, some Cic-acetal derivatives with a linear alkyl chain exhibited strong viral copy-number reduction activities compared with Cic2. These compounds might serve as lead compounds for developing novel anti-COVID-19 agents.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Acetals/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Pregnenediones , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/pharmacology , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Replication/genetics
18.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 28(7): 1010-1016, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1739639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in reducing the risk of adverse outcomes in COVID-19 outpatients at risk of developing severe illness. METHODS: COVERAGE is an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Outpatients with documented COVID-19, risk factors for aggravation, symptoms for ≤7 days, and absence of criteria for hospitalization are randomly allocated to either a control arm or one of several experimental arms, including inhaled ciclesonide. The primary efficacy endpoint is COVID-19 worsening (hospitalization, oxygen therapy at home, or death) by Day 14. Other endpoints are adverse events, maximal follow-up score on the WHO Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement, sustained alleviation of symptoms, cure, and RT-PCR and blood parameter evolution at Day 7. The trial's Safety Monitoring Board reviewed the first interim analysis of the ciclesonide arm and recommended halting it for futility. The results of this analysis are reported here. RESULTS: The analysis involved 217 participants (control 107, ciclesonide 110), including 111 women and 106 men. Their median age was 63 years (interquartile range 59-68), and 157 of 217 (72.4%) had at least one comorbidity. The median time since first symptom was 4 days (interquartile range 3-5). During the 28-day follow-up, 2 participants died (control 2/107 [1.9%], ciclesonide 0), 4 received oxygen therapy at home and were not hospitalized (control 2/107 [1.9%], ciclesonide 2/110 [1.8%]), and 24 were hospitalized (control 10/107 [9.3%], ciclesonide 14/110 [12.7%]). In intent-to-treat analysis of observed data, 26 participants reached the composite primary endpoint by Day 14, including 12 of 106 (11.3%, 95% CI: 6.0%-18.9%) in the control arm and 14 of 106 (13.2%; 95% CI: 7.4-21.2%) in the ciclesonide arm. Secondary outcomes were similar for both arms. DISCUSSION: Our findings are consistent with the European Medicines Agency's COVID-19 task force statement that there is currently insufficient evidence that inhaled corticosteroids are beneficial for patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Oxygen , Pregnenediones , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
19.
SAGE Open Med Case Rep ; 9: 2050313X211048279, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1596565

ABSTRACT

Steroid has recently been reported as a treatment for new coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The incidence of oropharyngeal candidiasis due to the inhaled steroid ciclesonide is lower than that due to other inhaled steroids. We report the first case of oral candidiasis with COVID-19 pneumonia using ciclesonide. A 75-year-old man was hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. After admission, an oral combination of lopinavir/ritonavir was administered, and ciclesonide was inhaled for 7 days. On the 14th day of hospitalization, white plaque was found in his oral mucosa. Candida albicans was identified by oral bacterial tests, and amphotericin B was initiated. On the 35th hospital day, negative result for C. albicans was confirmed. Intraoral monitoring and intervention by dental care workers are considered important for the prevention of infectious complications induced by corticosteroids.

20.
J Clin Med ; 10(16)2021 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1354996

ABSTRACT

Although some intravenous drugs have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no effective antiviral agents are currently available in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of 14-day ciclesonide treatment vs. standard care for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. A randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of ciclesonide inhalers was conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Patients were enrolled within 3 days of diagnosis or within 7 days from symptom onset and randomly assigned to receive either ciclesonide (320 µg inhalation twice per day for 14 days) or standard care. The primary endpoint was the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) eradication rate on day 14 from study enrollment. Clinical status was assessed once daily, and serial nasopharyngeal viral load was evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. There were 35 and 26 patients in the ciclesonide and standard care groups, respectively. The SARS-CoV-2 eradication rate at day 14 was significantly higher in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion within 14 days was 12 times more likely in the ciclesonide group (95% confidence interval, 1.187-125.240). Additionally, the clinical failure rate (high-flow nasal oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation) was significantly lower in the ciclesonide group (p = 0.034). In conclusion, ciclesonide inhalation shortened SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding duration, and it may inhibit the progression to acute respiratory failure in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04330586.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL